Recently we were reached by person interested in running CoreOS on apu2. CoreOS is a very interesting system from security point of view. It was created to support containers and scalability out of the box. Unfortunately it requires firmware supporting GPT. At that point I was not sure if I can utilize GRUB GPT support on apu2, but this led to other questions: * Is it possible to boot UEFI-aware OS on PC Engines apux boards ? * What level of security can I get with UEFI-aware OS in comparison to coreboot ? Those questions were much more interesting to firmware developer, because of that we decided to triage

coreboot UEFI payload on PC Engines apu2 platform. For interested ones in that topic I recommend to take look at 2. All my modifications of edk2 for the article below can be found in 3mdeb edk2 fork For those interested in UEFI-aware OS booting this blog post can be useful, but I also plan to write something straightforward that can be used and read by APUx platform users. NOTE: this blog post wait so long for publishing that coreboot community provided and improved support for tianocore payload. It can be chosen from menuconfig and adds some coreboot specific patches that improve overall support. Please use option:

Manual method still can be useful to try vanilla edk2 and hack with it.

apu2 firmware with UEFI/EDK2 payload Let’s start with building apu2 mainline. First follow

this instruction and build mainline version of coreboot. Meanwhile you can take care of EDK2 CorebootPkg build: git clone cd edk2 source On my Debian testing I had to explicitly change compilers to

gcc-5 and g++-5: sudo update-alternatives –install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-5 10 sudo update-alternatives –install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-5 10 Otherwise build fails. After that I was able to build

UEFIPAYLOAD.fd: make -c BaseTools build -a IA32 -p CorebootPayloadPkg/CorebootPayloadPkgIa32.dsc -b DEBUG -t GCC5 Build result is located in

Build/CorebootPayloadPkgIA32/DEBUG_GCC5/FV/UEFIPAYLOAD.fd. Following build and integration instructions I added build result as An ELF executable payload. uefi_payload It is important to deselect secondary payloads like memtest86+ and sortbootorder to avoid compilation issues.

EDK2 developer’s script For all interested in EDK2 code development I strongly advise to follow

Laszlo’s guide. In case of apu2 useful script may be:

Hacking UEFI payload to boot on apu2

CbSupportDxe assert First problem I faced was assert in

CbSupportDxe.c related to adding 1MB memory for LAPIC. Reservation happens in CbSupportDxe entry point. Loading driver at 0x000CFC25000 EntryPoint=0x000CFC2595B CbSupportDxe.efi InstallProtocolInterface: BC62157E-3E33-4FEC-9920-2D3B36D750DF CFC42190 ProtectUefiImageCommon – 0xCFC42928 – 0x00000000CFC25000 – 0x0000000000002580 PROGRESS CODE: V03040002 I0 Failed to add memory space :0xFEE00000 0x100000

PcRtcEntry assert Next problem happens during initialization of RTC:

Valid RAM and Time (VRT) bit in RTC Date Alarm register (aka Register D). By checking AMD Bios and Kernel Developer’s Guide (BKDG) I was not able to find issue with RTC. Reading all registers was done correctly and register layout seemed to be standardized for RTC devices. I faced one very strange situation after leaving apu2 for a night. First boot passed through above assert and finished booting much further (in BDS). This was very suspicious like timing or HW initialization issue. Final log looked like that: [Bds]=============Begin Load Options Dumping …============= Driver Options: SysPrep Options: Boot Options: Boot0000: UiApp 0x0109 Boot0001: UEFI Shell 0x0001 PlatformRecovery Options: PlatformRecovery0000: Default PlatformRecovery 0x0001 [Bds]=============End Load Options Dumping============= [Bds]BdsWait …Zzzzzzzzzzzz… [Bds]BdsWait(3)..Zzzz… [Bds]BdsWait(2)..Zzzz… [Bds]BdsWait(1)..Zzzz… [Bds]Exit the waiting! PROGRESS CODE: V03051007 I0 [Bds]Stop Hotkey Service! [Bds]UnregisterKeyNotify: 000C/0000 Success [Bds]UnregisterKeyNotify: 0002/0000 Success [Bds]UnregisterKeyNotify: 0000/000D Success Enable SCI bit at 0x804 before boot PROGRESS CODE: V03051001 I0 Memory Previous Current Next Type Pages Pages Pages ====== ======== ======== ======== 09 00000008 00000000 00000008 0A 00000004 00000000 00000004 00 00000004 00000001 00000004 06 000000C0 0000002E 000000C0 05 00000080 0000001A 00000080 [Bds]Booting UEFI Shell [Bds] Expand MemoryMapped(0xB,0x830000,0xC0FFFF)/FvFile(C57AD6B7-0515-40A8-9D21-551652854E37) -> MemoryMapped(0xB,0x830000,0xC0FFFF)/FvFile(C57AD6B7-0515-40A8-9D21-551652854E37) PROGRESS CODE: V03058000 I0 InstallProtocolInterface: 5B1B31A1-9562-11D2-8E3F-00A0C969723B CF954D28 Loading driver at 0x000CF6B8000 EntryPoint=0x000CF718BC1 InstallProtocolInterface: BC62157E-3E33-4FEC-9920-2D3B36D750DF CF96E590 ProtectUefiImageCommon – 0xCF954D28 – 0x00000000CF6B8000 – 0x00000000000A6FA0 PROGRESS CODE: V03058001 I0 InstallProtocolInterface: 47C7B221-C42A-11D2-8E57-00A0C969723B CF6BCA38 InstallProtocolInterface: 47C7B223-C42A-11D2-8E57-00A0C969723B CF945410 In debug logs there was nothing suspicious. Apparently register D of RTC returned correct value in

VRT register. Finally it turned out that VRT was incorrectly described in datasheet as read-only. Register D initialization function caused setting VRT bit to 0 what further led to Device Error assert. I fixed that problem by removing initialization from PcRtcInit.

Random unexpected behaviors One of other behaviors worth to note was unexpected coreboot reset after applying power:

Booting to UEFI Shell on apu2 I had “freeze” after:

gEfiShellEnvironment2Guid and second gEfiShellInterfaceGuid, so I decided to take a look where those GUIDs are used and hook there to see what may be wrong. After poking around I realized that those came from binary included in repository. What is included can be modified by changing SHELL_TYPE variable. When using BUILD_SHELL I see little bit different output: InstallProtocolInterface: 387477C2-69C7-11D2-8E39-00A0C969723B CF8DEBA0 InstallProtocolInterface: 752F3136-4E16-4FDC-A22A-E5F46812F4CA CF8DDF98 InstallProtocolInterface: 6302D008-7F9B-4F30-87AC-60C9FEF5DA4E CF5D9800 Control is passed in BDS code by calling

StartImage. For some reason I couldn’t print my logs to debug by printk. I verified that I’m in correct code by placing assert, code was interrupted in correct place but not serial log. Trying to change DebugLib and provide correct SerialIoLib led to reboot. I fixed that by removing DebugLib from libraries section in Ia32X64 DSC: diff –git a/CorebootPayloadPkg/CorebootPayloadPkgIa32X64.dsc b/CorebootPayloadPkg/CorebootPayloadPkgIa32X64.dsc index 27aba9f59cc9..262ba2b345af 100644 — a/CorebootPayloadPkg/CorebootPayloadPkgIa32X64.dsc +++ b/CorebootPayloadPkg/CorebootPayloadPkgIa32X64.dsc @@ -565,7 +565,6 @@ [Components.X64] #——————————

DoShellPrompt on function code: ShellInfoObject.NewEfiShellProtocol->ReadFile(…) I could not see the prompt and type any input commands.

Explaining ConIn, ConOut and ErrOut Big kudos to Laszlo Ersek who is well known from creating and maintaining OVMF. He pointed me to code in

ArmVirtPkg where workaround for my problem was implemented. I read through code from ArmVirtPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/PlatformBm.c and meant that I have to modify ConIn, ConOut and ErrOut variables. It was because those variables miss device path to UART device. ConIn, ConOut and ErrOut are global variables defined in UEFI spec. Those variables are available in boot time, runtime and are non volatile. This means that those variables are available during boot phase before firmware calls ExitBootServices and after that during system runtime. Those variables can be changed, but change takes effect after boot. So in short those variables define where we can find input, output and std error device. As described in mailing thread serial port can be reached through SerialPortLib API and it worked for me during boot phase. Precisely what worked for me was BaseSerialPortLib16550. I assume methods in this library are not available in runtime and that’s why switching to Shell caused no output. Second method is through EfiSimpleTextOutProtocol. Full explanation can be found in mentioned thread, but in short it is required to add device path of UART to mentioned global variables so those can be used. My understanding of stack is: |- ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.inf |- MdeModulePkg/Universal/Console/TerminalDxe/TerminalDxe.inf |- MdeModulePkg/Universal/SerialDxe/SerialDxe.inf |->SerialPortLib|CorebootModulePkg/Library/BaseSerialPortLib16550/BaseSerialPortLib16550.inf

BaseSerialPortLib16550 works on I/O and MMIO level to initialize and provide read/write capability for 16550 compatible UART device. This lib is utilized by SerialDxe DXE driver. SerialDxe produce gEfiSerialIoProtocolGuid and gEfiDevicePathProtocolGuid. First abstracts any type of I/O device and provide communication capability for it. Second gives ability of provides information about generic path/location information of physical or logical device (more information in UEFI spec). gEfiSerialIoProtocolGuid is consumed by TerminalDxe UEFI driver, which is responsible for producing Simple Text Input and Output protocols on top of Serial IO protocol. Those protocols give API like ReadKeyStroke, WaitForKey, OutputString, ClearScreen, SetCursorPosition and other that help in handling input and output data. Those protocols then can be used by Shell application to provide interactive experience.

Source code As I mentioned at beginning code is available on

3mdeb git repo. With it you can build coreboot.rom that boots to UEFI Shell. There are plenty things to do i.e. map and probably other commands do not work properly. Feel free to contribute.

Summary Above steps gave me ability to enable UEFI payload on top of coreboot firmware. This configuration seems to heavily use AGESA, which is a very similar to Intel FSP being responsible for big part of hardware initialization as well as exposing artifacts for UEFI-aware payload, bootloader and operating system. This blog post can open possibilities to boot UEFI-aware OSes on PC Engines apu2 platform as well as give ability to research AGESA firmware more extensively. If you are interested in enabling UEFI-aware operating system on your platform that already support coreboot do not hesitate to contact us. If you have any other questions or comments post those below.